
Almost every wine grape planted commercially is a grafted vine: a Vitis vinifera scion on the roots of an American species or hybrid, because those roots survive phylloxera and vinifera roots do not. The rootstock is chosen once, lives for thirty years or more, and quietly sets how the vine handles your soil's lime, your rainfall, and your fertility.
This page does not tell you what to plant, and you should be wary of anything that does. Rootstock choice depends on soil chemistry nobody has measured from a website, a water table you cannot see, the scion's own vigour, your rainfall, your training system, and what your nursery can actually supply. What follows is what these rootstocks are documented to do, with the disagreements named. The decision is yours and your agronomist's.
The single most common and most expensive confusion.
Active lime (calcaire actif) is the fraction of soil carbonate fine enough to go into solution and interfere with the vine's iron uptake. It is what causes lime-induced chlorosis — the yellowing between leaf veins that stunts a vine and, on a badly matched rootstock, eventually kills it.
Total carbonate is all the chalk in the sample, however coarse.
They are different measurements and they diverge wildly: a soil can be 40% total carbonate and only 8% active lime. Every figure in the table below is active lime. Ask your laboratory for that specifically. Comparing a total-carbonate result against these numbers will point you at the wrong rootstock while looking perfectly rigorous.
| Rootstock | Parentage | Vigour | Active lime | Drought | Wet soil |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riparia Gloire de Montpellier | Vitis riparia (pure species selection) | Low | 5–8% | Poor | Moderate |
| 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset | V. riparia × V. rupestris | Low–moderate | 8–11% | Low | Good |
| 3309 Couderc | V. riparia (tomentose) × V. rupestris (Martin) | Moderate | 10–12% | Moderate | Moderate |
| Schwarzmann | V. riparia × V. rupestris | Moderate | 8–12% | Low | Good |
| SO4 (Selection Oppenheim 4) | V. berlandieri × V. riparia | Moderate–high | 17–18% | Moderate | Good |
| Kober 5BB | V. berlandieri × V. riparia | High | 18–20% | Moderate | Good |
| Teleki 5C | V. berlandieri × V. riparia | Moderate | 17–20% | Moderate | Good |
| 420A Millardet et de Grasset | V. berlandieri × V. riparia | Low | 18–20% | Low | Moderate |
| 161-49 Couderc | V. berlandieri × V. riparia | Moderate | 23–25% | Moderate | Moderate |
| 110 Richter | V. berlandieri (Rességuier n°2) × V. rupestris (Martin) | High | 16–17% | High | Low |
| 140 Ruggeri | V. berlandieri (Rességuier n°2) × V. rupestris (du Lot) | Very high | 18–20% | High | Low |
| 1103 Paulsen | V. berlandieri (Rességuier n°2) × V. rupestris (du Lot) | High | 17–19% | High | Moderate |
| 99 Richter | V. berlandieri (Las Sorres) × V. rupestris (du Lot) | High | 16–17% | Good | Low |
| 41B Millardet et de Grasset | V. vinifera (Chasselas) × V. berlandieri | Moderate | ~40% | Good | Low |
| Fercal | Complex: (Berlandieri × Colombard No. 1B) × 31 Richter | Moderate–high | ~40% | Moderate | Moderate |
| Gravesac | 161-49 Couderc × 3309 Couderc | Moderate | 10–12% | Moderate | Moderate |
These numbers are indicative, not thresholds. Published limits for the same rootstock differ by several points between French, Italian and Australian sources, because they come from different trial soils, different scions, and different definitions of failure. Treat them as a shortlist tool and a conversation starter, not a pass mark.
Vigour is relative. A high-vigour rootstock on thin dry ground may build a smaller vine than a low-vigour one on deep fertile loam. These ratings compare rootstocks with each other, nothing more.
Most of the table follows from three American species and how they combine.
Which gives the rule of thumb that explains most of the table: if a rootstock has no berlandieri in it, it will not handle chalk. riparia × rupestris crosses — 3309C, 101-14, Schwarzmann — top out around 10–12% active lime no matter what else recommends them. The high-lime rootstocks are berlandieri crosses, and the extreme ones (41B, Fercal) had to reach for a vinifera parent or a complex pedigree to get there.
Vitis riparia (pure species selection) · vigour low · active lime 5–8% · drought poor · wet soil moderate
Advances ripening and shortens the cycle, which is why it persists in cool regions despite disliking dry soils. Shallow rooting, so it wants a soil that holds water without waterlogging.
V. riparia × V. rupestris · vigour low–moderate · active lime 8–11% · drought low · wet soil good
Copes with damp, heavier ground better than most low-vigour stocks and brings harvest forward slightly. Its low lime tolerance is the constraint that decides most sites.
V. riparia (tomentose) × V. rupestris (Martin) · vigour moderate · active lime 10–12% · drought moderate · wet soil moderate
Long-established and widely planted on deep, well-drained, LOW-LIME soils. Its riparia × rupestris parentage is the reason for the low lime ceiling — this is not a chalk rootstock, and planting it on chalk is a classic and expensive mistake.
Disputed: Sometimes described as drought-tolerant. Compared with riparia selections it is; compared with the berlandieri × rupestris group (110R, 140Ru, 1103P) it is not, and the label misleads on genuinely dry sites.
V. riparia × V. rupestris · vigour moderate · active lime 8–12% · drought low · wet soil good
Behaves broadly like the other riparia × rupestris stocks, with useful nematode resistance reported in several regions.
V. berlandieri × V. riparia · vigour moderate–high · active lime 17–18% · drought moderate · wet soil good
One of the most widely planted rootstocks in northern Europe. Tolerates moderately calcareous ground and heavier soils. Widely reported to aggravate MAGNESIUM deficiency in the scion, which is worth planning petiole analysis around rather than discovering at veraison.
Disputed: Its effect on fruit quality is argued about: some trials associate it with looser bunches and earlier maturity, others find no consistent effect once yield is matched.
V. berlandieri × V. riparia · vigour high · active lime 18–20% · drought moderate · wet soil good
Vigorous and tolerant of cool, damp, moderately calcareous soils, which is why it is common in central and eastern Europe. On fertile ground that vigour becomes a canopy-management problem rather than a benefit.
V. berlandieri × V. riparia · vigour moderate · active lime 17–20% · drought moderate · wet soil good
Less vigorous than 5BB with a similar soil range — often chosen where 5BB would overgrow. Common in German-speaking regions.
V. berlandieri × V. riparia · vigour low · active lime 18–20% · drought low · wet soil moderate
Unusual combination of low vigour with real lime tolerance, which is why it appears on calcareous soils where restraint is wanted. Slow to establish and unforgiving of drought while young.
V. berlandieri × V. riparia · vigour moderate · active lime 23–25% · drought moderate · wet soil moderate
Good lime tolerance with moderate vigour. Associated in several regions with sudden vine decline / premature death, which is the reason some growers avoid it despite its otherwise useful profile.
Disputed: The decline association is real in the literature but its cause is not settled, and it is not observed everywhere 161-49C is planted.
V. berlandieri (Rességuier n°2) × V. rupestris (Martin) · vigour high · active lime 16–17% · drought high · wet soil low
A standard choice for dry, poor, stony ground in Mediterranean conditions. Deep rooting and genuinely drought-tolerant. Delays maturity, which is an asset in heat and a liability in a cool climate.
V. berlandieri (Rességuier n°2) × V. rupestris (du Lot) · vigour very high · active lime 18–20% · drought high · wet soil low
Among the most drought- and lime-tolerant in common use, and correspondingly the most vigorous. On anything but poor dry ground the vigour is very hard to manage.
V. berlandieri (Rességuier n°2) × V. rupestris (du Lot) · vigour high · active lime 17–19% · drought high · wet soil moderate
Drought tolerance close to 110R with better tolerance of heavier and somewhat saline soils. Very widely planted in southern Italy.
V. berlandieri (Las Sorres) × V. rupestris (du Lot) · vigour high · active lime 16–17% · drought good · wet soil low
Similar family to 110R, generally reported as slightly less drought-tolerant and later to mature the crop.
V. vinifera (Chasselas) × V. berlandieri · vigour moderate · active lime ~40% · drought good · wet soil low
The classic Champagne chalk rootstock, and the reference point for extreme active lime. The trade-off is in its parentage: a vinifera parent means phylloxera resistance is MODERATE rather than high, which is the whole reason it is not simply used everywhere.
Phylloxera resistance: Moderate — lower than the others here, which is a deliberate trade-off rather than an oversight.
Disputed: Quoted lime limits cluster around 40% but the figure is a practical ceiling from Champagne experience rather than a measured constant, and behaviour above ~35% depends heavily on the site.
Complex: (Berlandieri × Colombard No. 1B) × 31 Richter · vigour moderate–high · active lime ~40% · drought moderate · wet soil moderate
Bred specifically for chlorosis resistance on very calcareous soils, with better phylloxera resistance than 41B. Reported to be sensitive to potassium and magnesium supply, so nutrition wants watching.
161-49 Couderc × 3309 Couderc · vigour moderate · active lime 10–12% · drought moderate · wet soil moderate
Selected in Bordeaux for acidic, gravelly soils where it tolerates low pH and free aluminium better than most. Not a lime rootstock despite one calcareous-tolerant parent.
Own-rooted vinifera is viable only where phylloxera is genuinely absent — some pure sand soils, Chile, parts of Australia, isolated pockets elsewhere. "We have never seen it here" is not the same as absence, and phylloxera arrives once. If you are considering it, that is a question for your local extension service and your regulator, not a website.
A rootstock recommender. We could join your block's soil data to this table and print an answer, and the answer would look authoritative and occasionally be wrong in a way you would discover in year three. Rootstock selection is regional, contested, and irreversible; making that call for you would be a judgement we are not qualified to make about a site we have not seen.
What we may build is a comparison — filter this table by conditions you name, with the sources shown and the trade-offs visible. That does the legwork without pretending to the expertise.
Generated from spec/rootstocks.json, so the figures here and anywhere else we use them cannot
drift apart. Compiled from the general viticultural literature rather than any nursery's catalogue.
Where we could not establish something confidently, it is absent rather than guessed.